Sunday, November 27, 2016

Clueless Romney Got Played Again by Global Elite


Our current conflict is between nationalism vs.  globalism (e.g. Brexit).  Brent Skowcroft recently confessed before the McCain-led senate subcommittee that the "Westphalian System" was a disaster and they were actively working to further liberalize it in favor of a global system.

The global elite scored another major victory against Mitt Romney making sure he has no part in the coming Trump administration. Trump was always going to win.  The first time Trump said something outrageous and the media expressed disdane but then made excuses, I was suspicious that the globists were going to pull a Schwarzenegger or Ventura-like campaign. 

However, the globalist would gave also known that it would make sense for Trump to invite Romney to be a part of his administration, to heal any divides in the Republical party.  However, by having Romney's handlers urge him to come out in such rude and hostile opposition to Trump assurred that Romney would have no place in the Trump administration.  I thought Romney calling Trump a "fraud" was ill-advised at the time, but now I see the likely intented results.  Well played!

If the elite want globalism, why was the Brexit succesfull? I think because they eventually want succession campaigns (Texit, Cascadia, etc.) in America to divide up the US.  The problem with the US is that it could be energy and natural resource self-reliant. Self-reliance doesn't work in a global system.


If Romney does get picked as Secretary of State, it is only in keeping with the globalist trend of having an LDS in a major government cabinet-level position when a major move is made against US constitutional principles.  I have made a list of this in other posts but examples are Reid Smoot, (federal lands, tariffs), J Ruben Clark (Monroe Doctrine), Ezra Benson (farm subsidies), David Kennedy (US dollar taken off gold standard), George Romney (HUD loans and low-income housing), Hatch and Reid (record deficits), Mike Leavitt (Obamacare). 

No comments:

Post a Comment