This is in intersting historical review. It doesnt weave globalism into its story but the history looks accurate from a Russian vs. West-only perspective.
My View:
I think the global conspiracy has placed the 2 most egotistical, narcissistic, personality-disordered leaders into position who both think 1. they aren’t part of the global conspiracy 2. they aren’t controlled by the global conspiracy 3. The other side operates or is controlled by the globalists.
This situation is like Ender’s Game. If you actually knew the nuclear end-game was the desired outcome, no one could knowingly do it. Even a knowing sociopath would never do it because it doesn’t benefit them. They have to get 2 narcissists into position and then provoke them into war.
This historical review suggests Putin could have assassinated Berezovsky. What it doesn’t explain is why Putin would have Berezovsky killed other than being an disloyal oligarch. Berezovsky had initially placed Putin into his position of power and had masterminded the privatization of Russian assets into the hands of the oligarchs. Putin rose to power promising to fight the oligarchs. This Putin campaign promise was fake. Putin and Berezovsky were playing both sides by creating the oligarchs and then placing Putin at the head promising to fight against them. Putin protected Yeltsin who he replaced and protects the loyal oligarchs. Was this just a simple Putin double cross?
In the end, Putin deposed a few token oligarchs, but has allowed the majority to remain in exchange for their political/financial support. The feud between Putin and Berezovsky was a fraud from the beginning. Berezovsky would go into lavish exile and become a Putin-loyal double agent. But in reality, Berezovsky has always been a loyal globalist.
Litvinenko was the FSB officer who originally blew the whistle on Putin and the fabricated threat by Putin against Berezovsky. Litvinenko published criticisms against Putin’s Russia as a “Mafia State” and was used as a pawn to play up the fake feud between Putin and Berezovsky.
Litvinenko was later assassinted by being poisoned by Polonium-210. Goldfarb, an employee of Soros and then Berezovsky, pointed the finger at Putin and the KGB as the killers. However, Goldfarb was the one with the scientific background and experience with Polonium-210. The KGB wouldn’t have left traces of polonium all over (as they did) unless it had been planted on them by Goldfarb.
Litvinenko was being used to play up the manufactured feud between Berezovsky and Putin. However, Litvinenko and reporter Anna Politkovskaya had recently met together to compare notes. Politovskaya was critcal of Putin and the Chechen Wars. Litvinenko had blamed Putin for the Moscow apartment bombing triggering the 2nd Chechen War (9/11-like false flag).
In the end, Litvinenko, Politkovskaya, and Berezovsky would all be dead in 3 very visible assassinations. Why assassinate 3 opponents in such visible ways. Why not make it look like an accident or from natural causes like they do in the West (Breitbart, Michael Hastings, Seth Rich)?
I think the globalists killed Berezovsky, Litvenenko, and Politkovskaya and others (Nemtsov) in very visible ways to futher blacken Putin’s reputation with the West and blacken the West’s reputation with Putin. And, in a way, “cut Putin’s leash” as Berezovsky had placed Putin and all the oligarchs into their positions of power.
It’s my opinion that it’s the globalist who have been conducting numerous very visible political assassinations of Putin’s political opposition to cause him to look bad. But Putin has such complete control over the Russian media and elections, he doesn't need to visibly assassinate his opposition to keep winning.
How would you weave globalism into this history?
No comments:
Post a Comment