NPR/PRI podcast and article about US giving non-military aid to Free Syria Army in 2014.
2015 ABC News article talking about ISIS and Toyotas. (why ask?)
YouTube Video showing ISIS Toyota parade and Apache helicopter escort/observing.
JudicialWatch article about leaked document from 2012 warning that funding to Free Rebel Army will go to radical ISIS.
Thursday, April 21, 2016
The 9/11 Papers are a leak of top secret information of the role of Saudi Arabia in the 9/11 attack. It is no secret that all th esupposed hijackers were Saudi and not from Afghanistan, Iraq, or Iran. The leak demonstrates the possible financial support of hijackers via the Saudi government.
What is the significance of this leak? As far as 9/11 goes, this small leak of information is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to what really happened on 9/11. So, why leak only about Saudi involvement?
Because of US oil fracking, the US is unbelievably nearly oil independent right now. The US has had a dependance of Saudi oil for decades and now it seems we are okay with "burning the bridge" with Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is threatening to pull out all it hundreds of billions of dollars from the US economy if the US goes any further in revealing its involvement in 9/11 or gives US citizens rights to sue them.
The 9/11 Bill that the US Congress is considering and Paul Ryan and Pres Obama are blocking, would give US citizens the right to sue Saudi Arabia for their involvement in 9/11. This bill doesn't mean victim families would get any money, but it would open 9/11 up to a wave of independent investigations which it never had before.
The 9/11 Papers put the US in a terrible economic predicament. China has just launched its gold-backed Yuan which it will not exchange with USD or any other non-gold, fiat currency. If Saudi Arabia pulls out hundreds of billions of dollars from the US economy, it might be enough to throw a US economy already on QE-life support into another 2008 crisis.
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
Genetics can play a significant roll in attraction. Close family members who are raised apart and then who meet for the first time as adults can experience significant physical attraction. Usually individuals are desensitized to genetic attraction by association with close relations during childhood. New studies are reporting that the increase in sperm donation may increase the incidence of half-siblings and half-cousins meeting as adults and experiencing genetic attraction.
Widespread semen donation may result in a significant increase in unintentional genetic attraction, accidental consanguinity, and genetic diseases in offspring of close relations. The increase in genetic disease may then be used as an excuse to require all married couples to undergo genetic screening and even artificial, non-random genetic selection and manipulation.
Fertility clinics claim the likelihood of accidental consanguinity is kept low with doctors limiting the number of times that each donor's sperm can be used. However, the media routinely reports on individuals who donate semen prolifically on Craig's List and fertility clinic doctors or employees that replace semen samples with their own.
The consequences of having so-called "designer babies" is a disruption in Hardy-Weinburg genetic equilibrium resulting in increased phenotypic variation (human breeds) but decreased genotypic variation and overall decreased genetic fitness. The consequence of non-random genetic selection is domestication and breeding our posterity into a permanent genetic slavery.
Friday, April 01, 2016
President Obama held another nuclear security summit. During this summit Pres. Obama made his case for unilaterally downsizing, dismantling and disarming the US nuclear arsenal. He says he is committed to continue to reduce US nuclear capability because he wants to set a good example to other countries to follow the US lead and secure their nuclear materials lest terrorist groups like Alqaeda or ISIS get ahold of nuclear materials and use them in a terrorist attack.
Yet, while the US has unilaterally complied with START2 and NEW START treaties, Pres. Obama admits that Russia "has not made as much progress as he would like". He didn't even mention China. I am not sure how President Obama can consider Russia's full-scale expansion and modernization of their nuclear arsenal progress. The US has de-MIRV'd all our minuteman 2 missiles (1 missile = 1 warhead) while Russia has developed a new long range ballistic missiles fit with 10 independently maneuverable warheads. Russia is also currently deploying their very effective S-500 anti-ballistic missile system in the Arctic. This recent article by Bill Gertz details Russia's nuclear expansion. We shouldn't forget China's nuclear capability either. This article by Bill Gertz in the Washington Free Becon demonstarates that President Obama has been successful at leaving us weak and naked before our adversaries.