Majority, Minority, and Nunes FISA Memos

http://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/20180129/106822/HMTG-115-IG00-Transcript-20180129.pdf

Transcript voting to approve release of “minority” FISA memo to the House.

1. There is the “majority memo” that Trey Gowdy has seen

2. There is the “minority memo” that was released to the House to protect “national security”

3. There is the “Nunes memo” sent to the White House which is an alteration of the “minority memo”.

I want to see the “majority memo” that Trey Gowdy saw.  Gowdy has dropped the ball on Benghazi, Clinton emails, and now this.  Who’s Gowdy really working for? 

The existence of the “minority FISA memo” implies knowing the truth in our government’s mind would compromise  our national security.   Also, this suggests our representatives  are in the dark about a great many things.   In my opinion our government representatives should have access to all information.  Democracy is not just a vote, but both access to information and a vote. 

Missing/deleted Strzok-Page (also having an extra-marital affair) texts also demonstrate a gross bias against Trump by senior FBI officers.

William Binney, NSA Whistleblower and Thinthread

https://youtu.be/uYg_0Imrnr4

https://youtu.be/3owk7vEEOvs

Clinton and Russian Skulkovo Foundation

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-clinton-worked-to-advance-russian-military-tech/article/2598281

http://www.g-a-i.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Report-Skolkvovo-08012016.pdf

http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/Collaboration/COCOM/EUCOM/Skolkovo.pdf

In addition to the Uranium One deal, according to the FBI, Hillary Clinton and the Obama Whithouse colluded with Russia,  facilitating the transfer of sensitive IT, computer, satellite, missile, and nuclear technology.

The U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth issued a report in 2013 (written in 2012) about the security implications of Skolkovo. The report declared that the purpose of Skolkovo was to serve as a “vehicle for worldwide technology transfer to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.” Of course, technology can have multiple uses—both civilian and military. And the report noted that “the Skolkovo Foundation has, in fact, been involved in defense-related activities since December 2011, when it approved the first weapons-related project—the development of a hypersonic cruise missile engine. The project is a response to the U.S. Department of Defense’s Advanced Hypersonic Weapon, part of the Prompt Global Strike program. Sophisticated physical security, consisting of cameras, thermal imaging, and alarms, also suggests that not all of the center’s efforts are civilian in nature.”158

Because of the way Skolkovo operates, “the government’s operation of Skolkovo and investment positions in companies will likely provide its military awareness of and access to technologies.”159

The report further noted that “Skolkovo is arguably an overt alternative to clandestine industrial espionage—with the additional distinction that it can achieve such a transfer on a much larger scale and more efficiently.”160

In short, the FBI and the U.S. Army have raised serious concerns about these activities serving to subsidize and enhance the military technological capabilities of the Russian government.