Russia vs. Ukraine



If the US opens up oil and gas production in ANWR such that Europe could boycott Russian oil, the Russian economy would be crushed. Russia might then feel compelled to invade and occupy Alaska. The US (Globalist/Soros/Hunter Biden) should not be interfering in Ukraine and not urging Ukraine to join NATO. This activity has only served to provoke Putin. I think ANWR was preserved untapped for exactly this scenario. This is going to escalate. Maybe Putin thought that President Biden was weak and wouldn't respond in the same way the US failed to respond to Crimea in 2014. But the problem is, neither Obama nor Biden are calling the shots. Biden will do whatever his globalist advisors tell him to do. And I think the globist have been waiting for exactly this kind of overreach by Putin. I dont see Putin nor the West backing down from this. I think Putin is betting that the West will back down the same as it did with Georgia and Crimea. 

Here is a video presentation talking about Putin's goals behind the Ukrainian conflict concerning oil. water, and geography:

https://youtu.be/If61baWF4GE

Russia insists Ukraine remain a buffer state. Putin wants status quo or he will wreck Ukraine:

https://youtu.be/JrMiSQAGOS4

False Allegations In Custody Cases

https://www.divorcemag.com/blog/false-allegations-in-custody-cases

I believe that parents know that courts generally favor shared parenting and that, without some proven heinous act, the courts will probably grant shared parenting since it makes sense that a child should have the involvement of both parents in his or her life, if possible. Fortunately, where the allegations are serious, our experience is that, when the client can hang in long enough, false allegations are finally proven to be false.

But what about the children?

Even when an allegation is eventually proven false, often times years or months of litigation have occurred. Usually the children have been told one or both versions of “what is going on,” or even sometimes coerced to be involved in the making of false allegations. The emotional abuse to a child involved in this type of litigation based upon false statements often times irreparably changes the course of a child’s life.

Think about an impressionable child who is falsely made to see a parent being portrayed as a monster. to the point where the child believes it, or at least to the point where it is “not okay” to love that parent any longer.

Who would do this to their own child, or to any child? Who wakes up and decides that the parent that was perfectly acceptable yesterday, is a monster today, and that, to gain some advantage or satisfy some selfish desire, it is okay to go on a mission to destroy the other parent, alienating them by saying that parent is suddenly a child molesting, drug addict, who beats their child?

What about the parent who engages in these tactics, and what about the child? Is this not abuse of its own kind—perhaps of the worst kind? What kind of parent finds these tactics reasonable? How many parents are losing custody of their children, losing decision-making abilities, losing the right to access records based on fabrications?

Even if the attempted fabrication is revealed, how many parents will gain full or joint custody but have a potentially unsalvageable relationship with a child who is emotionally broken or so damaged that he or she doesn’t want to be with that parent anyway?

Pathogenic Priming

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142689/

In SARS, a type of “priming” of the immune system was observed during animal studies of SARS spike protein-based vaccines leading to increased morbidity and mortality in vaccinated animals who were subsequently exposed to wild SARS virus. The problem, highlighted in two studies, became obvious following post-vaccination challenge with the SARS virus [2]. found that recombinant SARS spike-protein-based vaccines not only failed to provide protection from SARS-CoV infection, but also that the mice experienced increased immunopathology with eosinophilic infiltrates in their lungs. Similarly [3], found that ferrets previously vaccinated against SARS-CoV also developed a strong inflammatory response in liver tissue (hepatitis). Both studies suspected a “cellular immune response”.

structural characterization of the fusion core in syncytin envelope protein of human endogenous retrovirus family W.  Rui Gong et al. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092852/

The vaccine being taken forward, BNT162b2, encodes an optimized version of the whole spike protein, which should lead to “more consistent responses across diverse populations and in older adults,”

https://www.statnews.com/2020/07/27/pfizer-biontech-pick-covid19-vaccine-begin-pivotal-study/

Origin of SARS-CoV-2

1. What is not debated is that both the US, Canada, and China were all working on SARS/Coronavirus "gain-of-function" research.  

"In October 2014, the US government imposed a moratorium on federal funding of such research on the viruses that cause SARS, influenza and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome, a deadly disease caused by a virus that sporadically jumps from camels to people).

The latest study was already under way before the US moratorium began, and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) allowed it to proceed while it was under review by the agency, says Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a co-author of the study. The NIH eventually concluded that the work was not so risky as to fall under the moratorium, he says." (https://www.nature.com/news/engineered-bat-virus-stirs-debate-over-risky-research-1.18787)

2. this SARS-CoV-2 shows telltale signs of genetic engineering 

3. Canada and the US sent millions in  funding to the Wuhan lab. 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/u-s-canada-have-funded-chinese-lab

4. SARS-CoV-2 could have been accidently released by the Wuhan lab.  It is not likely that COVID-19 would have been purposefully released by either the China or the US.  However, it is possible that an engineered virus could have been planted by a globalist 3rd party, getting both sides to point fingers at one another in order to foment tensions (which is what is happening). If it was just an accident, then why the hostility? 

5. I'm especially interested in the links between the SARS-CoV-2 and HIV.  The circulating virus binds to a second receptor on T-lymphocytes shows a higher level of sophistication and engineering than even the UNC or Wuhan lab were known to be working on 

6. We have an American who worked at the Wuhan lab and attests to their employment of full Level 4 containment precautions.  The media had been making the Wuhan lab sound more like a midevil alchemy lab than a modern virology with international level 4 containment precautions. Some people would consider that a reliable source where others point to a potential conflict of interest.  What would be a better, more reliable source? Is FOX is telling us how to think?

7. There is a brief chinese article I read talking about a worker at the Wuhan lab who worked with bats and coronavirus and self-quantijed himself several times worried about possibly having accidently contaminated himself.

8.  The key here is that Patient Zero, looks like he was a worker at the Wuhan lab. But it seems clear this person had no idea he was infected and traveled around the countryside unknowingly spreading the virus. 

It seems to me, if there was an accidental exposure (usually a needle stick through a glove), the  worker would have suspected it and self-quarantined as opposed to living life as usual. 

9. If I were a 3rd Party, trying to foment hostilities between China and US, this is exactly how I would have conducted a false-flag operation. 

10.  This situation sounds a lot like Goldfarb writing about the Polonium poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko. Goldfarb documented evidence of KGB agents spreading traces of polonium all over their hotel room, something a person would only do if they didn't know they had been contaminated with it by a 3rd party. interesting that  Goldfarb himself worked for George Soros, and had an extensive background working in nuclear chemistry.  Goldfarb himself,  in my opinion, was the source of the polonium and Litvinenkos killer. 

Hydroxychloroquine and Zinc for COVID-19

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182877/