Monday, April 23, 2018

The Real Story About Cambridge Analytica

The last couple of weeks there was the story about how Trump used Cambridge Analytica (CA) to win the presidential election. The narrative was that CA used Facebook to test and classify people’s personalities using the OCEAN Personality Teat.  CA then micro-targeted these people and their Facebook friends with ads customized to their personality. 

This Facebook micro-targeting was NOT the story here. Facebook micro-targeting is NOT new, and was NOT a secret, and is only being used as a diversion to the real story that came out in the UK and was only lightly mentioned in the US and overshadowed by the Facebook non-scandal . Obama and every election since 2008 has been relatively open about using these social media tactics.  There are several pre-scandal lectures openly describing these social media tactics by CA and others. 

The real story about CA was NOT Facebook data but about an undercover sting/exposee done by UK Channel 4, where reporters posed as politicians from Sri Lanka seeking to hire CA to assist with a future campaign.

In addition to offering social media micro-targeting, Alexander Nix, CEO of  CA, was caught on video offering to 1. entrap, compromise, video, and blackmail incumbents with bribes and Ukrainian women. 2. operatives would be “ghosted in” and pose as research students, 3. similar tactics have a long history of use and had been recently well utilized in elections in Eastern Europe and Africa. 4. They had connections with British abd Israeli intelligence (Israeli being superior). 

Consider that the US is supposedly upset with a possible Russian interference in the 2016 election and democratic process, and no one seems very outraged or even aware about the real CA/SCL story.

And this isn’t even the whole story, CA is just a front for a UK company called the SCL Group led by Nigel Oakes.  SCL Group as well as CA have been employing corrupt tactics and interfering with and manipulating elections all over the world.  CA alone participated in 44 US elections in 2014.

Additionally, SCL sought out Trump’s election chief, Steve Bannon as much as Bannon sought out SCL.  A likely controlled CA whistleblower, Christopher Wylie, revealed an uncontrolled detail that Bannon thought SCL was an acedemic thing.  So, to sell Bannon on having SCL help with the election, they set up a sham office near Cambridge.  The whole Facebook/CA data thing was in reality described as more of a side/cover job to the real corrupt business of SCL. Bannon may not even had known what SCL was doing behind the scenes.

1. Wylie described CA as a “Full Service Propaganda Machine”

2.  Wylie admits to “psyoping” Steve Bannon in partnering with SCL and creating CA. 

This “psyoping” detail is not given by Wylie in any other interviews or testimony and a very important detail demonstrating what I had always suspected, that TPTB (the powers that be) wanted Trump, and made sure he won the election. That is why Rush Limbaugh kept making excuses for Trump after he would say stupid things instead of destroying him: “People hust like a guy who speaks his mind and says it as it is”.

Wylie (pink hair) admitted that micro-targeting had been done before, but after getting investment from Robert Mercer, they invent their Facebook scheme only at that point after inventing CA to fool Bannon. 

You have to realize, Wylie is controlled and in many interviews is emphasizing a Russian connection and the Facebook manipulation, but the Cambridge office was a sham office, and the Facebook micro-targeting (while interesting) was likely not the meat and potatoes of SCL’s corrupt business. 

Wednesday, April 11, 2018

The Truth About Cannabis Legalization

Cannabis legalization has led to the comercialization of unnatural products with elevated THC content near 20% and even higher.  Natural cannabis THC content is below 1%.  Cannabis abuse in Colorado is leading to increased crime, arrests, school suspensions among the poor and minority groups. Potent THC-containing products are exacerbating mental illness, depression and not helping it. 

Tuesday, April 10, 2018

Nuclear Atrocities

During and following WW2, the US found itself in a race to develop nuclear energy and the atomic bomb.  So, I’ve been learning a bit about some of the atrocities imvolved around the Manhattan Project and in the development of nuclear energy.  It seems that public safety was neglected in many instances and that the ends justified any means in many cases. Why were so many mistakes made?  Why were the safety of tens of thousands put in jeopardy? If the ends were noble, why were corrupt means continually used to achieve these ends?  Here is a brief list of documented US human radiation experiments.

  • feeding radioactive material to mentally disabled children[4]
  • enlisting doctors to administer radioactive iron to impoverished pregnant women
  • exposing U.S. soldiers and prisoners to high levels of radiation[4]
  • irradiating the testicles of prisoners, which caused severe birth defects[4]
  • exhuming bodies from graveyards to test them for radiation (without the consent of the families of the deceased)[5]

  • 1948-1979: 500,000-2 million children underwent nasal radium irradiation treatments to shrink adenoids. 

  • In a 1949 operation called the "Green Run," the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) released iodine-131 and xenon-133 to the atmosphere near the Hanford site in Washington, which contaminated a 500,000-acre (2,000 km2) area containing three small towns.[59]
  • From 1955 to 1960, Sonoma State Hospital in northern California performed radiation experiments on over 1400 mentally handicapped children who were dropped off and experimented on until death.
  • In an experiment in the 1960s, over 100 Alaskan citizens were continually exposed to radioactive iodine.[62]

I can’t list all the experiments.  It just goes on and on.  And this doesnt account for the many experiments with syphilis (Tuskegee, Guatemala children), and other chemical  agents. 

And this doesn’t cover the public exposures from nuclear testing and nuclear accidents that were covered up.  Amd this is just what we know about. Its just lies, lies, and more lies. 

1. Nevada testing and downwind exposures in Southern Utah. 
2. Bikini Atoll
3. SL-1 accident in Idaho
4. Sodium Reactor Experiment meltdown at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory near Simi Valley, California. 
5. Other activities at Santa Susana.
6. plutonium (Pu-239) plume from the 1957 fire at the Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant

So was it just hubris or fear of the Russians or national security interests that led to these and many other atrocities and coverups? 

Or maybe the problem is that the Manhattan project was ill-conceived at the start. The Manhattan Project was first planned at the Bohemian Grove in Sonoma County, California by the elite.  The S-1 Committee met at the Bohemian Grove Sept 13, 1942. Maybe the problem is we got exactly what you would expect when a group of elites meet in secret and set a secret agenda.    

The same goes for the FED Reserve set up by elites a similar secret meeting at Jekyll Island, GA in 1913. 

Monday, April 09, 2018

Real Accident Investigation

I was impressed about how much information engineers can deduce after an accident when a real investigation is conducted.  This video is in stark contrast to serversl other accidents investigations that seemed more like coverups.   As far as the SL-1 accident is concerned, the question still remains is why operators would withdraw the control rod. 

Sunday, April 01, 2018