Saturday, March 17, 2018
This is in intersting historical review. It doesnt weave globalism into its story but the history looks accurate from a Russian vs. West-only perspective.
I think the global conspiracy has placed the 2 most egotistical, narcissistic, personality-disordered leaders into position who both think 1. they aren’t part of the global conspiracy 2. they aren’t controlled by the global conspiracy 3. The other side operates or is controlled by the globalists.
This situation is like Ender’s Game. If you actually knew the nuclear end-game was the desired outcome, no one could knowingly do it. Even a knowing sociopath would never do it because it doesn’t benefit them. They have to get 2 narcissists into position and then provoke them into war.
This historical review suggests Putin could have assassinated Berezovsky. What it doesn’t explain is why Putin would have Berezovsky killed other than being an disloyal oligarch. Berezovsky had initially placed Putin into his position of power and had masterminded the privatization of Russian assets into the hands of the oligarchs. Putin rose to power promising to fight the oligarchs. This Putin campaign promise was fake. Putin and Berezovsky were playing both sides by creating the oligarchs and then placing Putin at the head promising to fight against them. Putin protected Yeltsin who he replaced and protects the loyal oligarchs. Was this just a simple Putin double cross?
In the end, Putin deposed a few token oligarchs, but has allowed the majority to remain in exchange for their political/financial support. The feud between Putin and Berezovsky was a fraud from the beginning. Berezovsky would go into lavish exile and become a Putin-loyal double agent. But in reality, Berezovsky has always been a loyal globalist.
Litvinenko was the FSB officer who originally blew the whistle on Putin and the fabricated threat by Putin against Berezovsky. Litvinenko published criticisms against Putin’s Russia as a “Mafia State” and was used as a pawn to play up the fake feud between Putin and Berezovsky.
Litvinenko was later assassinted by being poisoned by Polonium-210. Goldfarb, an employee of Soros and then Berezovsky, pointed the finger at Putin and the KGB as the killers. However, Goldfarb was the one with the scientific background and experience with Polonium-210. The KGB wouldn’t have left traces of polonium all over (as they did) unless it had been planted on them by Goldfarb.
Litvinenko was being used to play up the manufactured feud between Berezovsky and Putin. However, Litvinenko and reporter Anna Politkovskaya had recently met together to compare notes. Politovskaya was critcal of Putin and the Chechen Wars. Litvinenko had blamed Putin for the Moscow apartment bombing triggering the 2nd Chechen War (9/11-like false flag).
In the end, Litvinenko, Politkovskaya, and Berezovsky would all be dead in 3 very visible assassinations. Why assassinate 3 opponents in such visible ways. Why not make it look like an accident or from natural causes like they do in the West (Breitbart, Michael Hastings, Seth Rich)?
I think the globalists killed Berezovsky, Litvenenko, and Politkovskaya and others (Nemtsov) in very visible ways to futher blacken Putin’s reputation with the West and blacken the West’s reputation with Putin. And, in a way, “cut Putin’s leash” as Berezovsky had placed Putin and all the oligarchs into their positions of power.
It’s my opinion that it’s the globalist who have been conducting numerous very visible political assassinations of Putin’s political opposition to cause him to look bad. But Putin has such complete control over the Russian media and elections, he doesn't need to visibly assassinate his opposition to keep winning.
How would you weave globalism into this history?
Sunday, March 11, 2018
The US Constitution is under attack and the media/Google is complicit due to their censorship, failure to ask follow up questions, omitting critical details, drawing the wrong conclusions, and pushing false narratives.
FBI failures aside to identify Cruz and investigate him as a risk prior to the incident. It is not supposed to be the American way to punish everyone for others mistakes, and crimes. But we see this knee-jerk reaction happen more commonly.
Florida Teacher Stacy Lippel ID’s the shooter as wearing full body armor with helmet and bullet-proof vest, etc.
Uber driver says Cruz was carrying oversized backpack/guitar case. Is this enough space to conceal AR-15, helmet, gas mask, and body armor? And did Cruz have time to put on all this body armor and remove it again according to the timeline of events? Yes, Cruz was at the school and Cruz was a shooter, but the question is, was he the only gunman.
Neighbor videos Cruz branshing a handgun last year in his yard. I believe this footage was given to FBI.
Parkland Timeline: Uber drops off Cruz at 219pm. Cruz seen in bathroom loading AR-15 at 220pm. Fire alarm pulled and shooting starts at 221pm. Gun jams and shooting stops at 225pm. Cruz drops backpack and gun and joins fleeing students.
2 student witnesess report multiple shooters. One student talked with Cruz as they fled the building and only identified him as wearing a gas mask.
Video of 4 responders putting bag into back of white truck immediately after shooting. This is removing evidence from a crime scene. What was in the bag? These 4 responders removing evidence match the teacher description of one of the shooters.
Thursday, March 01, 2018
Hogg fake video (says it 932 am while talking to Alex View (Isabelle Robinson) who is giving an anti-gun rant saying “yes, I am filming this with you”)
Crisis Actor from Redondo Beach, California
EMS stand-down order.
Wait for SWAT, establish a perimeter.
Scripted town hall
Cruz law enforcement calls
No arrest policy
Amazing, that the debate over if David Hogg is a crisis actor is being used to get people fired, and censorship. (well played).
Wednesday, February 28, 2018