Saturday, March 17, 2018

Roman Abramovich

This is in intersting historical review. It doesnt weave globalism into its story but the history looks accurate from a Russian vs. West-only perspective. 

My View:
I think the global conspiracy has placed the 2 most egotistical, narcissistic, personality-disordered leaders into position who both think 1. they aren’t part of the global conspiracy 2. they aren’t controlled by the global conspiracy  3. The other side operates or is controlled by the globalists.

This situation is like Ender’s Game. If you actually knew the nuclear end-game was the desired outcome, no one could knowingly do it.  Even a knowing sociopath would never do it because it doesn’t benefit them. They have to get 2 narcissists into position and then provoke them into war. 

This historical review suggests Putin could have assassinated Berezovsky.  What it doesn’t explain is why Putin would have Berezovsky killed other than being an disloyal oligarch.  Berezovsky had initially placed Putin into his position of power and had masterminded the privatization of Russian assets into the hands of the oligarchs. Putin rose to power promising to fight the oligarchs. This Putin campaign promise was fake. Putin and Berezovsky were playing both sides by creating the oligarchs and then placing Putin at the head promising to fight against them. Putin protected Yeltsin who he replaced and protects the loyal oligarchs. Was this just a simple Putin double cross? 

In the end, Putin deposed a few token oligarchs, but has allowed the majority to remain in exchange for their political/financial support. The feud between Putin and Berezovsky was a fraud from the beginning. Berezovsky would go into lavish exile and become a Putin-loyal double agent.  But in reality, Berezovsky has always been a loyal globalist. 

Litvinenko was the FSB officer who originally blew the whistle on Putin and the fabricated threat by Putin against Berezovsky.  Litvinenko published criticisms against Putin’s Russia as a “Mafia State” and was used as a pawn to play up the fake feud between Putin and Berezovsky.

Litvinenko was later assassinted by being poisoned by Polonium-210.  Goldfarb, an employee of Soros and then Berezovsky, pointed the finger at Putin and the KGB as the killers.  However, Goldfarb was the one with the scientific background and experience with Polonium-210.  The KGB wouldn’t have left traces of polonium all over (as they did) unless it had been planted on them by Goldfarb.  

Litvinenko was being used to play up the manufactured feud between Berezovsky and Putin.  However, Litvinenko and reporter Anna Politkovskaya had recently met together to compare notes.  Politovskaya was critcal of Putin and the Chechen Wars.  Litvinenko had blamed Putin for the Moscow apartment bombing triggering the 2nd Chechen War (9/11-like false flag).

In the end, Litvinenko, Politkovskaya, and Berezovsky would all be dead in 3 very visible assassinations. Why assassinate 3 opponents in such visible ways. Why not make it look like an accident or from natural causes like they do in the West (Breitbart, Michael Hastings, Seth Rich)?

I think the globalists killed Berezovsky, Litvenenko, and Politkovskaya and others (Nemtsov) in very visible ways to futher blacken Putin’s reputation with the West and blacken the West’s reputation with Putin. And, in a way, “cut Putin’s leash” as Berezovsky had placed Putin and all the oligarchs into their positions of power. 

It’s my opinion that it’s the globalist who have been conducting numerous very visible political assassinations of Putin’s political opposition to cause him to look bad.  But Putin has such complete control over the Russian media and elections, he doesn't need to visibly assassinate his opposition to keep winning. 

How would you weave globalism into this history?

Thursday, March 15, 2018

Robinson’s Arch

Now in the western quarters of the enclosure of the temple there were four gates; the first led to the king's palace, and went to a passage over the intermediate valley; two more led to the suburbs of the city; and the last led to the other city, where the road descended into the valley by a great number of steps, and thence up again by the ascent for the city lay over against the temple in the manner of a theater, and was encompassed with a deep valley along the entire south quarter.

— Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 15:410.

It is not certain if Josephus listed these gates from right-to-left or left-to-right.  But if the “kings palace” refers to Fortress Antonia, then the first gate is describing Robinson’s Arch which spanned the Tyropoeon Valley on the left. The middle 2 gates included the Kiponus Gate, and the right-most gate leading to the “other city” with a “great number of steps” leads to the City of David.

Mishnah Three 

1)      There were five gates to the Temple Mount:

2)      The two Huldah gates on the south were used both for entrance and exit;

3)      The Kiponus gate on the west was used both for entrance and exit.

4)      The Taddi gate on the north was not used at all.   

5)      The Eastern gate over which was a representation of the palace of Shushan and through which the high priest who burned the red heifer and all who assisted with it would go out to the Mount of Olives. 

"But the other hill, which was called "Acra," and sustains the lower city, is of the shape of a moon when she is horned; over against this there was a third hill, but naturally lower than Acra, and parted formerly from the other by a broad valley. However, in those times when the Asamoneans reigned, they filled up that valley with earth, and had a mind to join the city to the temple. They then took off part of the height of Acra, and reduced it to be of less elevation than it was before, that the temple might be superior to it. Now the Valley of the Cheesemongers, as it was called, and was that which we told you before distinguished the hill of the upper city from that of the lower, extended as far as Siloam; for that is the name of a fountain which hath sweet water in it, and this in great plenty also. But on the outsides, these hills are surrounded by deep valleys, and by reason of the precipices to them belonging on both sides they are every where unpassable.Josephus Wars: Book 5 Ch:4: 1

Sunday, March 11, 2018

Witness Teacher ID’s Parkland Shooter

The US Constitution is under attack and the media/Google is complicit due to their censorship, failure to ask follow up questions, omitting critical details, drawing the wrong conclusions, and pushing false narratives. 

FBI failures aside to identify Cruz and investigate him as a risk prior to the incident. It is not supposed to be the American way to punish everyone for others mistakes, and crimes. But we see this knee-jerk reaction happen more commonly. 

Florida Teacher Stacy Lippel ID’s the shooter as wearing full body armor with helmet and bullet-proof vest, etc. 

Uber driver says Cruz was carrying oversized backpack/guitar case.  Is this enough space to conceal AR-15, helmet, gas mask, and body armor?  And did Cruz have time to put on all this body armor and remove it again according to the timeline of events?  Yes, Cruz was at the school and Cruz was a shooter, but the question is, was he the only gunman.

Neighbor videos Cruz branshing a handgun last year in his yard. I believe this footage was given to FBI. 

Parkland Timeline:  Uber drops off Cruz at 219pm. Cruz seen in bathroom loading AR-15 at 220pm. Fire alarm pulled and shooting starts at 221pm.  Gun jams and shooting stops at 225pm. Cruz drops backpack and gun and joins fleeing students. 

2 student witnesess report multiple shooters. One student talked with Cruz as they fled the building and only identified him as wearing a gas mask. 

Video of 4 responders putting bag into back of white truck immediately after shooting.  This is removing evidence from a crime scene.  What was in the bag?  These 4 responders removing evidence match the teacher description of one of the shooters. 

Thursday, March 01, 2018

Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Universal Declaration of Human Rights


Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction. 

Article 1.

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2.

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3.

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4.

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5.

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6.

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7.

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8.

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10.

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11.

(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13.

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14.

(1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
(2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15.

(1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16.

(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17.

(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18.

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20.

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21.

(1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
(2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22.

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23.

(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
(4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24.

Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25.

(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26.

(1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
(3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27.

(1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28.

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29.

(1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30.

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.