1. What is not debated is that both the US, Canada, and China were all working on SARS/Coronavirus "gain-of-function" research.
"In October 2014, the US government imposed a moratorium on federal funding of such research on the viruses that cause SARS, influenza and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome, a deadly disease caused by a virus that sporadically jumps from camels to people).
The latest study was already under way before the US moratorium began, and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) allowed it to proceed while it was under review by the agency, says Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a co-author of the study. The NIH eventually concluded that the work was not so risky as to fall under the moratorium, he says." (https://www.nature.com/news/engineered-bat-virus-stirs-debate-over-risky-research-1.18787)
2. this SARS-CoV-2 shows telltale signs of genetic engineering
3. Canada and the US sent millions in funding to the Wuhan lab.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/u-s-canada-have-funded-chinese-lab
4. SARS-CoV-2 could have been accidently released by the Wuhan lab. It is not likely that COVID-19 would have been purposefully released by either the China or the US. However, it is possible that an engineered virus could have been planted by a globalist 3rd party, getting both sides to point fingers at one another in order to foment tensions (which is what is happening). If it was just an accident, then why the hostility?
5. I'm especially interested in the links between the SARS-CoV-2 and HIV. The circulating virus binds to a second receptor on T-lymphocytes shows a higher level of sophistication and engineering than even the UNC or Wuhan lab were known to be working on
6. We have an American who worked at the Wuhan lab and attests to their employment of full Level 4 containment precautions. The media had been making the Wuhan lab sound more like a midevil alchemy lab than a modern virology with international level 4 containment precautions. Some people would consider that a reliable source where others point to a potential conflict of interest. What would be a better, more reliable source? Is FOX is telling us how to think?
7. There is a brief chinese article I read talking about a worker at the Wuhan lab who worked with bats and coronavirus and self-quantijed himself several times worried about possibly having accidently contaminated himself.
8. The key here is that Patient Zero, looks like he was a worker at the Wuhan lab. But it seems clear this person had no idea he was infected and traveled around the countryside unknowingly spreading the virus.
It seems to me, if there was an accidental exposure (usually a needle stick through a glove), the worker would have suspected it and self-quarantined as opposed to living life as usual.
9. If I were a 3rd Party, trying to foment hostilities between China and US, this is exactly how I would have conducted a false-flag operation.
10. This situation sounds a lot like Goldfarb writing about the Polonium poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko. Goldfarb documented evidence of KGB agents spreading traces of polonium all over their hotel room, something a person would only do if they didn't know they had been contaminated with it by a 3rd party. interesting that Goldfarb himself worked for George Soros, and had an extensive background working in nuclear chemistry. Goldfarb himself, in my opinion, was the source of the polonium and Litvinenkos killer.
